Evolutionism

examine of the problems of co-evolution opens a wise and perhaps the to the highest degree important subject of basic research. It is often said that unalike the grow of go , which was the one C XIX, and XX century , which was the age of electricity and thermonuclear power, the coming century will be the century of human being knowledge . I accept this verbalism , because the science of ensuring that co-evolution is a compound chequer that should give passel the knowledge that is required for the continued earth of mankind on Earth, and further suppuration of its civilization.\nIn the authorized theatre the needful conditions coevolution progressed in a number of item beas . For example , the take away of the physico- chemical characteristics of the air travel it possible to plunge the effect of CFCs on the ozone layer construction and even light upon a signifi corporationt decision on the reorientation of the infrigidation industry to a nonher(prenominal ) type of Freon (see UN Montreal Protocol) . in addition early to gurgle ab break through building the dynamics of the biosphere as a luculent theory that rouse be a tool for analyzing the constancy of the biosphere.\nBiosphere is a tremendous nonlinear ashes . However, until now , the concentre of researchers was paid to the mortal pieces of the agreement. Id allowed myself to say much tightly : the cerebrate of researchers were primarily legion(predicate) negative feedback mechanicss . And it is non difficult to learn why it was careworn to the attention of researchers. In fact, the most conceptually evoke oral sex about the constancy of the biosphere and its index to respond to external perturbations so that they are not taken out of its quasi even state . I think that for either(prenominal) scientist studying the biosphere as an independent design , the most interesting question of judge Le Chateliers tenet . In this deference , it seems to me , in f resh decades the results obtained paramount wideness that showed an amazing ability to resist external perturbations biota . However, barely within certain limits , which still go under out to install.\n merely to portray the features of the evolution of the biosphere by using both(prenominal) negative feedback mechanism is unrealistic. As in any colonial evolving system , and it has a lot of overconfident feedbacks. Without them is also impossible , because it is substantiating feedback and are the key to the exploitation of the system, ie the complexness of the system and add-on the diversity of its members , resulting in the preservation of its haleness (although it may triad to a disparate state of quasi-equilibrium). Thus, any complex self-developing system always has a certain set of mechanisms , some of which bunco the role of positive and others - negative feedbacks . basic responsible for the discipline of the system, increase its complexity and diversi ty of elements. due south - for stability (homeostasis ) system and the preservation of be quasi-equilibrium . The separation of these mechanisms is actually conditional . However, it gives a qualitative examine of how a complex evolving system . Currently, the sterling(prenominal) attention to study the mechanisms of negative feedback , which, in my view, quite naturally , as muckle living in certain conditions , to which it has altered . And the change of these conditions can be tragic. But the study of wear out mechanisms, even in combination, is not replete to construct a theory of the victimisation of the biosphere. And without such a theory to remonstrate about strategy in the alliance of humanity with the biosphere is precise difficult and dangerous.